PROHIBITION OF PHOTOGRAPHY and ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE:
. Why is it that filming is not allowed in Courts of Law which in place are to up-hold Law and Order in Lands and provide public protection, and not be instruments and venues of Public Persecution, and what is the Role played by the Judiciary, and the Magistrates, and Congress, and Senate, and Voters, and Tax-payers, and Commissions and Commissioners, Media, and the Public, and Audience, and Journalists and Book-keepers, and Academics and Scholars and democracy and the Inter-National Community and Inter-National Communities???
. Have Governments and Laws become so Sinister and malevolent and maleficent??? Is the public so blind? . . Also, what is with all the PROHIBITION OF PHOTOGRAPHY and ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE: Whom does the prohibition protect, and who is punished by lack of the evidence, or when evidence is deemed inadmissible in court?
. We can vividly see the ingenuity of the Legalese and those with the vested interests and just how much they want to protect the public and the helpless and those seeking justice and redress for crimes committed and perpetrated, and also seeking pro-gress and progression and not regression and suppression and oppression.
. Mubeen Mughal Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA
.Wednesday 7th January 2015